It's All About Seeing the Signs

Ace of Base hasn’t seen the mark for quite some time now, but that doesn’t halt the remainder of us from doing so. In fact, on a regular basis, Iodine see a batch of marks — and I don’t like most of them. With that in mind, I thought I’d take this week’s column to uncover a few examples:

Caution: Children at Play: Why are we supposed to be cautioned of this — in lawsuit they necessitate a steady quarterback? Or, am I interpreting this incorrect entirely, and it turns out that all the children are at the theater, and this is some kind of propaganda to state grownups to travel too? Either way, I believe there necessitates to be some mulct black and white underneath the warning, preferably written in crayon...

Slow: Children at Play: For those who are not able to see colons, this mark presents an even larger job than the 1 above. If these children are so slow, maybe they should be running laps instead of playing. That manner their velocity will no longer justify the production of signs...

Warning: Vicinity Watch: What exactly is the vicinity watching? Rather than discouraging crime, this mark promotes people to execute Acts in the center of the street, with the cognition that there will always be an audience...

No Parking Here to Corner: I’m tired of being told where I can’t park. Instead, state me where I can. Because of these signs, I now experience that I can park on a rooftop or in a treehouse, simply because there are no marks there...

Falling Rock: I thought VH-1 was supposed to be our beginning for this...

No Right Turn: If every bend is a incorrect one, this do driving virtually impossible. Society necessitates to be more than positive, and — as all great historiographers have got never said — that gets with mark making...

Anything with the words “when children are present” underneath: This pretty much translates into “Ignore the above statement.”

Any image of an animal: This typically intends that the animate being may be crossing the road, but this ruinations the continuity of signs. If there is going to be a image of a duck crossing, for example, then why not a image of person fillet or yielding? And besides, ducks crossing the route aren’t amusing anymore… unless they are stapled to the chicken, in which lawsuit — wow, talking about a laughter riot...

But I digress.